Is The Progressive Consumption Tax Really The Way to Go?
I recently read an article in Forbes about "A Tax Even Libertarians Can Love". Just the title made me curious as to what kind of a tax my close libertarian friend supposedly would like. The tax they discuss is a progressive consumption tax. Robert Frank proposes getting rid of our current income tax system and going to a progressive consumption tax. They discuss how this would be beneficial because it promotes saving and taxes those who spend lavishly. I'm not going to go into all the details of how is kind of a tax would work but feel free to do some more research on it if you are not already familiar with it.
After reading the article I was disappointed in this tax that would promote thrift. I do agree that our current system is broken and we do need to change to a tax system that favors saving and good behavior. I just don't feel like this tax is it.
Here is what I didn't like about the progressive consumption tax:
At the Not the Jet Set household we are true believers in the "Less is More" saying. For us a Fair Tax system seems to be by far the best option that is truly fair and involves less government oversight/ control.
Do you think I'm totally off base with the progressive consumption tax? What are your thoughts?
1 comments:
I'm not sure the author is a libertarian. Most libertarians I know support a value added or retail tax coupled with a constitutional amendment specifying the exact tax rate (so Congress may not change it on a whim.)
A key libertarian tenet is to reduce government, not increase it. The plan outlined by Mr. Frank doesn't seem to meet that goal.
Post a Comment